Socialists believe the state is an institution to appropriate surplus value from the society. There are market and non-market forms of socialism. Writers like Tolstoy argue that Jesus was a social anarchist. Socialism is for citizen ownership of society https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism https://twitter.com/jimmysong/status/1036644723484762112 …
-
-
You’re a corporate slogan, “maximize your human capital” with blockchain paint, and a carbon copy of Hayek without knowing it, you offer nothing newhttp://www.alexanderblum.net/2018/08/young-pseudo-and-the-theory-of-everything/ …
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Socialism is for citizen-ownership of society" Please frame this in reality, not in Marxist theory, which is the most anti-pragmatic dogma on the planet. Look at where ownership really falls in Socialist states *in practice*. Stop ignoring human nature.
-
Wealth exists very much in Socialist states. It is hyper-accumulated by bureaucrats first and foremost. Then redistributed as a control mechanism, keeping everyone *equally poor*. It is not sustainable. This "for the people" shit is a lie built for useful idiots.
-
Look at Chavez and his family. Look at his daughter, worth $2B living in NYC. Same for Cuba and others. When the means of production and CHOICE are taken away from the people, it is not a "citizen-owned society". It's a government-ruled society. Socialist is a step backwards.
-
And don't even get me started on the "Jesus was a Socialist" revisionism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.