(Not my domain areas, but it is so reassuring to hear that you've beat bland eyed audiences down. I make my arguments smaller and simpler everyday, reducing myself...trying to beat that blank eye)
A chapter in history. Readers asked when the relationship between PO and DAGs was first reported. My earliest record is this '93 Stat Conference in Florence https://ftp.cs.ucla.edu/pub/stat_ser/R195-LL.pdf … (Section 6) As I recall, the audience had NO IDEA what I was talking about - blank eyed.#Bookofwhyhttps://twitter.com/yudapearl/status/1222814915921997824 …
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I will be among the first to admit that I also have no idea what you are talking about. Hope the potential outcome of my ignorance does not deprive me of remaining a loyal & admiring Twitter follower. The only graph I recall is "y = mx + b."
-
Don't give up so easily. "Ein Lecha Adam SheEin Lo Shaa" says the Mishna (Every person has untapped potential). Even "y=mx+b" is not trivial. I once asked a statistician what Y_x is, when b is correlated with x. Repeating this story would get me into another trouble.
#Bookofwhy
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.