Was thinking last night: what would a version of async/await look like that I'd actually want to use. If only it'd been closer to this.pic.twitter.com/sh0EQHiut6
-
Sorry, I didn't mean the `cb`, I meant the callback function(err,res)
If we're defining new semantics entirely there wouldn't be anything stopping from it yielding multiple times either right?
-
-
E.g. just treating it as sugar for closures
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In the async/await case, how could we get multiple [err,res] over time? (PS: there's another proposal, for-await-of http://2ality.com/2016/10/asynchronous-iteration.html …
-
y'all are talking about generators right? which apparently i learned at
#campJS doesn't suffer from the try catch problem with promises.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.