Hot take: unless you're a large company, when you say you want "containers", you probably mean you want "binaries" instead
Was thinking about this. Unless it's for safety/scale, well-written binaries are better at most things people usually want containers for
-
-
Easy to move around, easy to deploy, no peer deps (if done right), no daemons required, multiple languages on same host. It's the works
-
Ideally at some point we can add resource limits to our binaries too - self contained. Would be sweet. No network, cpu, mem leaks happening
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I often find that the requirements around using containers is much more around operational constraints. ways around that though =0)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.