Was thinking about this. Unless it's for safety/scale, well-written binaries are better at most things people usually want containers for
Hot take: unless you're a large company, when you say you want "containers", you probably mean you want "binaries" instead
-
-
-
Easy to move around, easy to deploy, no peer deps (if done right), no daemons required, multiple languages on same host. It's the works
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
portable binaries + exact instructions from how to rebuild them from the source + instructions for how to run them in concert...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They probably mean "docker" if they speak about "containers". The ecosystem around containers is the real value.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.