Reason why I don't necessarily recommend is b/c lots of repetition, and bit thick on formally proving. But guess it was v important they did
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Continuing this thing where I'm reading papers. This time by
@dominictarr - 10/10, clear language, cool ideas, seemed v. thorough. Recommendpic.twitter.com/B3UCmoUIg2
-
Yay, read the Kafka paper (been reading papers on breaks now) - this one was good too, tho I disagree on some things. Worth a read
pic.twitter.com/Oi4sbxDuxN
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
BLOOMS FOR THE BLOOM GOD
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Great next read after the bloom paper: https://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/pubs/EppGooUye-SIGCOMM-11.pdf …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nice! I recently implemented a BF and wrote about it. It's probably the TLDR to the paper if anyone is interestedhttps://olivif.github.io/2017/bloom-filter-part-1/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
