Doesn't this still lack packaging? The value of docker is not in the runtime (which is terrible) but in the packaging. Also, port remap?
-
-
Replying to @timperrett @bodil
Tar is quite reasonable tbh - if you wanna get fancy you could also distribute rabin-chunked deltas. Docker's is ok but not that great
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also looks like port forwarding is built in; systemd-nspawn -p <from>:<to>
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts @bodil
I found this informative: https://coreos.com/rkt/docs/latest/rkt-vs-other-projects.html#rkt-vs-systemd-nspawn … - rkt for packaging and signing, nspawn under the hood = winning.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @timperrett @bodil
Also the thing I don't like about rkt is that you need to build it first. nspawn is installed by default. There's also rumors about rkt.. hm
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts @bodil
even a tgz that you deboostrap or whatever, gotta have a way to sign and distribute.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
haha, tho github releases isn't a half bad idea :P
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.