Doesn't this still lack packaging? The value of docker is not in the runtime (which is terrible) but in the packaging. Also, port remap?
-
I found this informative: https://coreos.com/rkt/docs/latest/rkt-vs-other-projects.html#rkt-vs-systemd-nspawn … - rkt for packaging and signing, nspawn under the hood = winning.
Also the thing I don't like about rkt is that you need to build it first. nspawn is installed by default. There's also rumors about rkt.. hm
-
-
even a tgz that you deboostrap or whatever, gotta have a way to sign and distribute.
-
haha, tho github releases isn't a half bad idea :P
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
in truth i worry about the future of coreos, from a business POV. The building aspect is unavoidable, as you need a dist
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.