well, they feel native — you use <audio> and it creates an audio player, use <google-map> and it creates a map — all in HTML
What's with people liking custom elements? I feel the only argument going for them is: "it's globally scoped XML" - and not sure that's good
-
-
-
not quite - first you need to define what <google-map> is using JS in the first place; I feel `GoogleMap()` is equally descriptive
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The intention of sharing self contained components with familiar import semantics ,independent of loader or 3rd party is noble
-
But after working with them in a large project I feel the current situation is far from that goal, mainly because browser suprt
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
shadow-CSS and breaking out of it was apparently quite inconvenient. Hence the creation of CSS Modules and Sheetify
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yessss, exactly! I might perhaps not agree with the implementation details, but having it just be JS is a powerful abstraction
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yup, exactly
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd rather not pull in 35KB worth of polyfill just to get there :/ - feel functions are easier, better understood
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
haha, fair enough
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
yeah, very true - sometimes we gotta cheat on that though; but as long as that's well-encapsulated it's fine (e.g. complex widgets)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.