dammit, turns out `barracks` was very much the right idea - https://github.com/yoshuawuyts/barracks …
-
-
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
needs to be added to the emmitter benchmarks? Looks like a different approach.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hypercubed
but sure, yeah that's an option - don't think I'd use barracks nowadays tho - kinda wanna mash it together with send-action
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
first results with barracks: https://gist.github.com/Hypercubed/e92adbf79e3256a0d3e222f140a0433b …
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
Maybe I'm using barracks incorrectly, only the first handler is called?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @hypercubed
yeah only first handler is called, used to be multi-handler but it was wayyyy too complicated
5:03 PM - 3 Jun 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.