@feross I generally shun projects that require one - I don't see the point. Perhaps @kemitchell has some insights to share?
-
-
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts@kemitchell Thanks for letting me know. Remember any of the projects you shunned for having a CLA? I'm interested to read them3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @feross
@feross no worries ^__^ Hah no I forgot which, just get a huge feeling of "nope" whenever I see run into one@kemitchell1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts Ever submitted to a DCO project? Same feeling? cc@feross1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts Sorry! http://developercertificate.org/ + Signed-Off-By. Originally for Linux kernel after SCO. Now in Node Core CONTRIBUTING, too.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kemitchell
@kemitchell I like signed off by - it provides useful information to see who were involved - don't quite understand dev cert's intent tbh2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts 1) As maintainer, have enough trustworthy people reviewed so I don't have to? Like "LGTM". 2) IP ownership audit trail.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kemitchell
@kemitchell waiit, so you would include that in a commit message body or... ?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts Most projects just put copy in source tree. By convention, Signed-Off-By in commit message means making that certification.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
@kemitchell ahh, gotcha! Thanks for explaining ^__^
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.