@rekshark ehh, by socket I mean REQ socket on the API side; like with http. That's the way to approach it? :)
-
-
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts well, too much latency for waiting on a new socket, so I might try to reuse a set of sockets if possible1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts ya filtering on a uuid might be easier, but you could pop sockets between active/available arrays2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rekshark
@rekshark looks like on the handler side things aren't any better: RES appear to be capped at 1 connection :( http://www.freelists.org/post/nanomsg/REQREP-worker-example,12 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts that's right, hey this sounds like a use case for nn_device!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts try AF_SP_RAW family when creating nn_device, and you may need sudo privlges. AF_SP_RAW+REQ == Router; AF_SP_RAW+REP == Dealer1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts good luck! Keep me posted on the outcome, and open issues or add some docs on node-nanomsg! Cc:@LostOracle1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@rekshark @LostOracle I def will! This is pretty involved so going to do some quick HTTP derp for client and then port it to nanomsg. Soon!™
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.