@rekshark ah, existing responses are talking about enveloping messages http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16999393/zeromq-client-server-bi-directional-communication-possible-with-only-havin … - is that how you'd do it?
-
-
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts wait until you get what you need before calling rep.send(msg)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rekshark
@yoshuawuyts does my answer on gist solve? lemme know, I'm gonna step out to grab a slice of pizza but i'll be back in a few1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts ahh i see what you're getting at. i think ur gonna need to either filter on some uuid for the sub response or go req/rep again1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@rekshark ehh, by socket I mean REQ socket on the API side; like with http. That's the way to approach it? :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts well, too much latency for waiting on a new socket, so I might try to reuse a set of sockets if possible1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts ya filtering on a uuid might be easier, but you could pop sockets between active/available arrays2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.