@yoshuawuyts Given assembly code lacks any high level features and is Turing complete I would say its definitely possible at the least.
Would a language without functions, classes or methods be possible? Only making binaries stream to each other. Simpler than shell
-
-
-
@hal9zillion haha, good point. Maybe the better question is: would it be useful? Is there a place for language that only connects others? - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@hughskennedy current best: graph language where each node is arbitrary bin + OS resources, and then link them... as a language. sh pipes++ - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
I know simple is subjective. But I mean "less features"; shell replacements have tried fixing its shortcomings, not improve its strengths
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@yoshuawuyts SIMPLERS FOR THE SIMPLER GODThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.