@jaffathecake @domenic @pornelski Are people really saying that? :|
-
-
Replying to @KoryNunn
@KoryNunn@jaffathecake@domenic@pornelski agree with the sentiment of implementing low level only, think stuff like fetch is too high even2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts the aim is to expose everything we can without breaking security. What's missing?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake I believe substack had a good rant on the matter. I'm mostly confused by the whole API, feel it does too much.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts I cleared up the confusion around that https://jakearchibald.com/2015/thats-so-fetch/ …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake guess part of me is also very upset about a promise only API.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake because they force me to work around them. Functions can be converted to promises, implicit catch is hard to revert.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts why do you need to work around them?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake implicit catch. Exceptions should bubble up3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@jaffathecake I'm not sure if the process.nexttick equivalent in the browser allows you to work around them, but it feels like a hack
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.