@jaffathecake @domenic @pornelski Are people really saying that? :|
-
-
Replying to @KoryNunn
@KoryNunn@jaffathecake@domenic@pornelski having control over the render loop would be grand, yeah.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake with webgl you can control the render loop. Virtual Dom is a way of controlling when renders are flushed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts it's not, it's a way of controlling when DOM changes are applied, which is different but related2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@yoshuawuyts what do you want that you can't do now? If you want full paint control, there's webgl, but guess you want something in between?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake it wouldn't have been a problem if the DOM was just a lib on top of webgl, could resort to a lower level when needed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@jaffathecake but it's not, and for perf we need a way to flush control down. The way it's done in userland is fine imo, it works2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts I'm not getting a handle on the specifics here, but there are efforts to provide hooks into the various stages here1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jaffathecake
@jaffathecake cool, that's excellent news!
6:13 AM - 7 Nov 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.