-
-
Replying to @RReverser
@RReverser@sebmck@getify Well, if I had known the resulting tweetstorms I probably wouldn't have even started this. Babel's cool, be happy2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @RReverser
@rreverser@sebmck babel's apparent stance: "all previous interop attempts failed, and will continue to fail, until we absorb them all"1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @getify
@rreverser@sebmck which is a vote to say "standards processes failed, so let's invent our own" (hence my "NIH" earlier)2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @getify
@rreverser@sebmck btw, in that world, until/unless babel announces full support for usable CST, all the tools i want to build are DOA.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AdamRackis
@adamrackis i didn't ever insinuate he did. the point is, the ESTree standards process was working on this problem. he is not.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @getify
@adamrackis it is a fact that if babel's model wins, and ESTree flounders, and thus CST fails, my projects fail.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@AdamRackis asking to play nice with neighbors is not presumptuous. If we don't standardize we risk forever repeating ourselves. @getify
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.