@JonKoops Yeah ofcourse it's going to win, but it's bad by design. They should've stuck to Commonjs, just because of the sheer volume.
-
-
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts We should use tables, tables work the best. Tables even work in IE5! Same discussion different topic.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:modules … it's build to be inter-operable with current solutions. It's just standardizing common practices.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts IN the future maybe, but I think they mean through a grunt/gulp task.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts I think it's pretty well thought out. But hey opinions right.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@yoshuawuyts But they're not. Every JavaScript engine will have this build in soon. This is the final solution (for a long time).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@JonKoops Je sais, but don't mistake yourself in that those standards cannot be influenced.
-
-
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
@JonKoops The removal of octals from the spec (intruduced first in strict mode) is already causing a shit storm.0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.