Also didn't proof read this because hey, I don't proof read my tweets either. And it might have taken me another few weeks to publish.
Trying to commit to writing more. Hope it works out alright 
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
nice, I am already doing fallible iterators (sync right now, will make them async later) and one other annoying thing is you can't use (?) to yield an error inside of your next() implementation. using this macro right now to wrap errors in a return Some() https://github.com/peermaps/eyros/blob/04e34d8ef9d1cdbd1e7d7795ba3d4714cf7bcddf/src/tree.rs#L41-L48 …
-
for making `stream?` thing work nicer, I think it'd be really cool if you could use a ? with destructuring in the loop args: `for stream? in listener.incoming() {}`
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
so,
@piecritic keeps talking about making an ergonomic http://rx.rs (not focused on zero-cost-ness, might be based on futures::stream though). you describe built-in lang support and keywords, this would instead be an API known from other languages -
This would be an API coming from Golang, which has built-in select too (and probably join in some shape too). It seems like rxrs would be combinators based, which isn't really how I like to program. But different tastes I guess.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.