failure::Error needs to be standardized. A generalized catch-all error type is essential to so many programs.
-
-
Replying to @yoshuawuyts
lol, I literally just came out of a long discussion about how problematic failure::Error is.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes
Replying to @bodil
Hah, well yeah I strongly prefer it over writing bespoke variations of Box<std::error:Error + Send + Sync + 'static> all over the place.
12:29 PM - 14 Mar 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.