Feature idea: "deny(missing_examples)" for Rust. Fails the build if you didn't write a doctest for a method. Just spent 2 hours wiring up perl, sed, and awk to recreate part of this functionality. Would be fantastic if it was possible to enforce higher quality with just a flag.
Ohh, yes I'd love to! Mentoring would be a fantastic help! :D After a stamp of approval would come... an RFC? A pre-RFC? Maybe the latter is the right way to get a sense if people are into it?
-
-
i don't think it needs an rfc, or even much by way of gating on team approval. if we make it allow-by-default (which is what i would want anyway) then we can just start with the PR IIRC that's how "missing-docs" happened in the first place, lol
-
Oh yeah fair. Wanna open the issue for that? I can write mentoring instructions but I'm going to be on planes for the next 20 hours.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I think we just need to open an issue and get docs team approval. Lints are sometimes RFCd but the last docs lint was not. You don't need a team stamp of approval to *open* an rfc. But it's not necessary here afaict.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.