After WWII, there was a campaign to argue that Nazism had no real ideology, that it was just some group of people, to delegitimize it.
-
-
Show this thread
-
That had some value, but its downside was that people forgot that Nazism *does* have an ideology, and it never went away.
Show this thread -
Nazism conceives of the world as a struggle between races.
Show this thread -
That's not "race" in the 20c US "black/white" sense; Jews, Slavs, Britons, and so on are all "races," too.
Show this thread -
And Nazis believe that races have certain characteristics, which are passed on through the blood; and that they are bound to some land.
Show this thread -
There are a few other articles of Nazi belief: for example, that acting ("the will") is better than thinking (a sign of weaker races).
Show this thread -
And that the strength of a race is most strongly exemplified through the untrammeled Will of its leaders.
Show this thread -
(If you're thinking, "Wait, you just made an ideology around obeying people who don't think?" you may have spotted one of the problems.)
Show this thread -
The "National Socialism" is a very real thing, too. It's socialism *for members of the nation.* And they decide who's in and who's out.
Show this thread -
Government subsidies for "good, decent people?" Sure. Just don't give it to those parasites.
Show this thread -
So here's the important thing: These ideas make up Nazism. You don't need to wear a swastika to believe in them.
Show this thread -
And here's the other important thing: If you're in the US, you may have grown up hearing "Nazis are the bad guys" without learning *why.*
Show this thread -
Or you may have learned about concentration camps, but not about what happened in the ten years leading up to them.
Show this thread -
When the Nazis came to power in Germany, they didn't build camps. They passed laws restricting jobs for "non-German" races (nations).
Show this thread -
They argued that money spent on the disabled was simply a drain on society, and we should move them to hospitals.
Show this thread -
They held angry public rallies which often included violence.Their leaders and militias flaunted the law, because they knew it didn't apply.
Show this thread -
They saw who they could kill and get away with, and gradually, over time, expanded that.
Show this thread -
They encouraged "voluntary self-deportation" of unwanted Jews, by banning them from holding jobs.
Show this thread -
When no country wanted a few million refugees, it was their proof that nobody wanted the Jews.
Show this thread -
So camps were started up as administrative holding centers, where they could be put to good use – that is, as slave labor.
Show this thread -
The disabled, moved to remote hospitals, were out of sight and out of mind: so that's where they did their first experiments of mass murder.
Show this thread -
I could go on about this for hours, but the point is: this was a story of an ideology which did exactly what it said on the label.
Show this thread -
Not by showing up one night and starting to kill people, but slowly, gradually, building up public normalization of what they did.
Show this thread -
When I refer to Nazis in the US, I am not using this as some kind of generic slur against people I disagree with.
Show this thread -
Nazis are people who subscribe to the ideology of Nazism, plain and simple, whatever organizations they do or don't affiliate with.
Show this thread -
Nazism is an ideology fundamentally inimical to everyone who isn't a Nazi. It is a known and proven threat to life.
Show this thread -
"Punching Nazis" is a way to signal to them that their ideology is not welcome in the public sphere, to keep them quiet and afraid.
Show this thread -
If Nazis are extremely few in number, and very reluctant to speak, then their public speech becomes an opportunity for the public...
Show this thread -
to rally against them, to reiterate its refusal to allow this. This is where the old ACLU "speech for Nazis" argument came from.
Show this thread -
If they are somewhat bigger in number, they become a part of public discourse – thus legitimating questions like "well, *are* [X] people?"
Show this thread - 11 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.