They're seems to be a broad skepticism about the idea that companies succeed or fail in part based on their architectural choices. I find this mystifying.
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Isn't it clear that the ability to delivery new features, quickly and reliable, matters? To implement complex ideas to surprise and delight your customers?
Prikaži ovu nit
Architectural choices aren't the only thing that determines those abilities, but they surely contribute. A poorly factored, hard to test, spaghetti mess of a system might be easier to come up with at first, but will tank your productivity soon enough.
-
-
It's as if people imagine that the only thing that good engineering can be used for is premature preparation for scale. Weird.
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
It matters! I'm maintaining an 18-year-old Perl system. We eventually concluded that for the next 20 years the best would be to restart entirely from scratch (will take years). As an aside: your 2011 ACM article planted the seed which led us to go all-in on OCaml. ;)
-
Neat! What's the system?
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I wish you'd tweeted this before I said no to the second round of Jane Street interviews :(
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.