Become a member at 
I guess it depends on the assumptions around wealthy carbon emissions from consumption within a city vs a suburb. If consumption is held constant, that makes sense to me.
Question, aren't rich people creating less carbon when we increase the density? I don't think anyone is saying density alone will solve it, but it is better than sprawl, no?
-
-
-
Also happy to tax the rich a lot more, tax gas and carbon emissions, then spend that money on subsidized housing especially in rich neighborhoods, and therefore integrate while we densify.
#YIMBY
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.