Become a member at 
Let's be ABSOLUTELY CLEAR: There is NO conflict btwn speeding up permitting process & having more govt funding for subsidized housing. None.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ok, what the hell is sarcastic font and how do i get it? it might make my online life much easier
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
possibly the opposite. Expedited process = smaller planning staff = money saved.
-
Brown has been clear he doesn't want to fund BMR until development costs are reigned in, to the extent possible
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
um idk of any "good" articles haha, just basing this off my aggregate impressions of public comments
-
but I'm sure I could dig up a terrible article from 48 Hills or Berkeley daily planet
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
with an additional consideration of impact of no-project alt.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
um no. it eats the homes of the poor. the disappearing is done by the former residents.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ztownsend faster process likely to produce more affordable housing funding/units b/c of inclusionary fees/reqs, ‘impact fees’ etcThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
induced demand is a fact. we can argue re extent, esp. in supply crunch, but overall premise is sound
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.