There's a reason they partner up for bids & don't bid every project. We can talk silly reqs from MOHCD but a minimum is arbitrary.
-
-
Replying to @jrivanob
If there was a ballot prop to reduce those silly regs, we'd also be for that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf
Okay but that doesn't mean supporting a minimum makes sense. Won't this delay already slow housing construction?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jrivanob
Don't think it will. Currently we only give a briefing on the pipeline to the small group of local affordable devs.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf
So why not change just that? Open it up more.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jrivanob
If someone wants to submit a bs proposal that is clearly gonna lose, there's nothing to prevent that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yimbyaction @jrivanob
But this was a way to force the bidding process to open up. Is it necessary the best way? Probably not. But all ballot props suck.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
putting together "a bid" is itself a time consuming, costly process. costs are so constrained 2begin w.that this is dumb
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Competition has some costs. But the end result is often a more efficient system.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
not always. & in this case we're looking for orgs w.specific, discrete skill sets.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I believe that's what we're always looking for when gov purchases goods and services. Right?
-
-
we're not talking about commodities like pens or office chairs.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Become a member at