If someone wants to submit a bs proposal that is clearly gonna lose, there's nothing to prevent that.
-
-
Replying to @yimbyaction @jrivanob
But this was a way to force the bidding process to open up. Is it necessary the best way? Probably not. But all ballot props suck.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf
But why support it then? Lawmaking by ballot is so hard to reverse, why risk something like affordable housing policy on this?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jrivanob
Again, I haven't heard any good arguments that this will slow things down. Ive heard self-serving arguments and insults.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf
Well if right now there aren't three bids for projects, then conceivably MOH wouldn't get three often, thus delaying projects.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jrivanob
Currently, a small group of local dev control the bidding process. Which is why they're so mad.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf
Where's evidence other affordable housing developers have been shut out? Bridge and Mercy not local but frequently involved.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jrivanob
I've heard over and over how CCHO forces members to toe the line. They hold power to control who gets bids. That's not right.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf
From whom? Other developers? Which ones?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jrivanob
Members of CCHO and people who wanted to say things politically that CCHO would not approve of. They have to be careful.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
So, I'm not gonna tweet it. But we ALL know it's happening.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Become a member at