@sfyimby is a no on U. What was their position on P?
-
-
Don't know about Yimby. GrowSF is an official proponent for P. Poor political choice.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pcohensf @kimmaicutler and
May be a poor political choice, but I don't think it's a poor policy choice.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf and
How many projects actually get three bids?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Pretty much none. That's the point.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf and
How would a ballot measure change that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It requires 3 bids, forcing gov to solicit more bids, not just go thru ccho.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf and
That doesn't magically give aff. housing developers more capability though.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
There's a reason they partner up for bids & don't bid every project. We can talk silly reqs from MOHCD but a minimum is arbitrary.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
@coreysmith_17@kimmaicutler GrowSF does not understand how aff housing is developed. Hating CCHO is not a solution.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I've spoken w/ lots of aff housing dev. I listen. Why don't you make a compelling argument?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Become a member at