As did the California legislative leadership. http://goo.gl/oB5Wki “I don’t think there’s any support...”
-
-
Replying to @pcohensf
? What does other people not supporting it say about anything
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @derivativeburke @ekrubnivek
You seem to imply something with tweet about Jane Kim not supporting By-Right Development. And so..? The legislature opposed it
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pcohensf
she says she is for affordable housing. it would have done a ton for the growth of affordable housing in SF…
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @derivativeburke @ekrubnivek
Unfortunately you are misinformed. It would have done little to nothing to increase affordable housing in SF.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pcohensf
15% of every new development it permitted would have been affordable ? and it would have brought a lot???
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @derivativeburke @ekrubnivek
By-Right Development was bad policy. Thanks to legislative leadership and SF electeds for pushing back. Better policy ahead.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pcohensf
That policy would have done more for “number of affordable housing units under construction” than any other piece of legislation
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
Was gonna jump in, but you seem to have this under control.pic.twitter.com/Ew43oVslKx
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Become a member at