More housing everywhere = more options & agency. Less housing = segregationist prescription from the powerfulhttps://twitter.com/wapella/status/752297520068497408 …
-
-
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf
since the worst segregation is in the most heavily Fed subsidized areas, not sure you've thought through this one
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wapella
did you read the article? It's about loosening zoning restrictions, not more of the same...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf
it's about Federal meddling in local issues. They have a terrible track record. Why trust them?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Er. Because if local says "Sorry, no black people can live here" that's a federal problem. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
already illegal for 70 years, and not point of the story. There is no law forcing people to segregate, but it happens.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
yes illegal explicitly. But via exclusion of new build that de facto does it?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
new or incumbent buildings cannot recognize race, as they are inanimate objects. Must be something else going on.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Try reading this: http://www.citylab.com/housing/2016/01/how-zoning-restrictions-make-segregation-worse/422352/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
doesn't make any sense. Seems much more likely that poor people can't afford expensive real estate, than 'segregation'
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
John. Did you read the article? Be honest.
-
-
read it a few months ago, why?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Become a member at