More housing everywhere = more options & agency. Less housing = segregationist prescription from the powerfulhttps://twitter.com/wapella/status/752297520068497408 …
-
-
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf
since the worst segregation is in the most heavily Fed subsidized areas, not sure you've thought through this one
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wapella
did you read the article? It's about loosening zoning restrictions, not more of the same...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @yimbyaction @grow_sf
it's about Federal meddling in local issues. They have a terrible track record. Why trust them?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Er. Because if local says "Sorry, no black people can live here" that's a federal problem. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
already illegal for 70 years, and not point of the story. There is no law forcing people to segregate, but it happens.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @wapella
.
@wapella@Kazanjy ...wanna know what else is illegal?
pic.twitter.com/NtyzZCeZjv
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Chicago is segregated, and full of federal housing money. Fed plan did not work. Your solution? More Federal money.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I think we agree more than you realize. We advocate for loosening zoning & eliminating local discretionary controls
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
abundant market rate housing is a very critical piece of the equation that we overwhelmingly support
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Become a member at