#SB330 is "a pretty modest bill. ...on the books, conceptually, a great number of units can be built. ...local governments join with us and permit that housing in a timely manner..."
-
-
Show this thread
-
#SB330 "is about giving certainty to projects that have already been approved conceptually... You don't change the rules midstream, you don't increase the fees while that aplicants permit is being processed."Show this thread -
.
@DavidGarcia209 from the@TernerHousing in support of#SB330 says, "I don't need to belabor the great housing shortage we are in. ...but I do want to belabor that the time for solutions is YESTERDAY."Show this thread -
Next up is Pedro Galvao from
@NPHANC talks about how escalating fees hurt Affordable Housers who struggle to get their projects approved across the state.Show this thread -
Among the supporters:
@BRIDGEhousing@salesforce@facebook@SFHAC@CaliforniaBIA@UrbanEnviroCA "housing policy is climate policy"@Habitat_org@SVatHome@cayimby@eb4everyone@yimbyaction "for CA's future"@NAACP and more!Show this thread -
Folks in opposition include: City of Cupertino City of Beverly Hills City of San Mateo Marin Pasadena Solano County MEDA AIDS Healthcare Foundation "a better way forward to house California."
Show this thread -
#SB330 passes out of the Local Governance Committee.@NancySkinnerCA talks about how the bill is less impactful than it started out as, but remains an important step to getting housing built!Show this thread -
Thank you Senator
@NancySkinnerCA for being such an incredible warrior for housing!pic.twitter.com/8sGanELT1I
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Become a member at