Why do YIMBYs and affordable housing advocates keep fighting each other? Current theory is YIMBYs have concluded that development reduces mean housing costs and affordable housing advocates conclude luxury development reduces affordable housing. But these beliefs don't contradict
-
-
SF YIMBY Retweeted
SF YIMBY is a club of
@yimbyaction, which is hella pro-Affordable! https://twitter.com/yimbyaction/status/839931347107901440?s=19 …SF YIMBY added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Steven Klaiber-Noble Retweeted David desJardins
I'm looking at threads like this https://twitter.com/David_desJ/status/1123686232326905861?s=19 … These people have come to opposite advice on how to proceed
Steven Klaiber-Noble added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
There are two opposing factions: don't build anything, or let developers build unlimited market-rate housing without zoning restrictions. Both are wrong. The solution has to be somewhere in the middle: build more housing, but use zoning restrictions to ensure it is affordable.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @David_desJ @SFyimby and
How do you ensure affordability with zoning restrictions? I'm open to the idea that there are people hurt by development that the YIMBYs are missing. But I've not seen it spelled out
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @snoble @David_desJ and
These are not the correct sides and there are many more sides. YIMBYs basically advocate for 4 things: 1) allowing multifamily housing in more places 2) speeding up permitting 3) more $$$ for subsidized Affordable Housing 4) reforming bad incentives (prop13, parking)
1 reply 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @yimbyaction @snoble and
Market rate and Affordable Housing is good. Both need multifamily zoning and a streamlined process that doesn't enable NIMBYs.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @yimbyaction @snoble and
The primary funding source for Affordable Housing is not taxes on Market Rate Housing, and shouldn't be. It we do that, we'll never get enough of either. We should directly subsidize a ton of Affordable housing through taxes, bonds, etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @yimbyaction @snoble and
Zoning restrictions don't help us get Affordable Housing. Sometimes a few big cities use the "granting of density" as a carrot to get market rate developers to give more funding to Affordable Housing. We have mixed feelings about these kinds of policies.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
You can often get into situations where folks are demanding really high levels of funding for Affordable Housing such that in the end nothing pencils, so we lose both Golden Eggs (affordable housing) and the goose (market rate housing). As fans of gooses and eggs, this is bad.
-
-
Replying to @yimbyaction @snoble and
This is where the "YIMBYs don't support Affordable Housing" argument largely comes from. We've generally advocated for Inclusionary Housing that is "feasible" which has put us at odd with folks who think IZ can be any rate and they don't care if it kills some projects.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @yimbyaction @snoble and
There is also a long history of tearing down "naturally affordable" aka old housing and replacing it with new housing that is more expensive. Really pursuing development without displacement is REALLY complicated, and folks are terrified that building = demolition.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Become a member at