As of June 2018, a year after it was approved, HOME SF had attracted only four applications for a total of 172 units, of which 52 are BMR units. (Page 3 below). HOME SF is a failure. Using it to inform others' policies would likely also cause failure http://commissions.sfplanning.org/cpcpackets/2018-006910PCA.pdf …
-
-
Replying to @louismirante
Start on page 23 of the 2018 SF Housing Inventory report, published March 2019: http://commissions.sfplanning.org/cpcpackets/1996.0013CWP_2018.pdf … In total? State program has 35 proposals, 3,200 units HOME-SF has 8 proposals, 445 units. Only 4/43 has been entitled or had building permits issued.


pic.twitter.com/9RHm6UIpA7
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Bobakkabob37
Wow. This is very informative, thank you, Bobak. Do you know what percent of these were subsidized? Is there a way to figure that out?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @louismirante
I think you want Table 11? Whatever 106/445 is, is the percentage of units in the HOME-SF pipeline that are subsidized in some fashion, though I don't know at which levels. Appears to be 24% on average.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bobakkabob37
Hmm, my question is more, "What number of density bonus units are from unsubsidized projects (not using state or federal subsidies, for example.)?"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @louismirante
Ah. I can't help you there. I need to make dinner
Ask @sfplanning and@California_HCD1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
@heyanmarie might be able to help
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

Become a member at