Become a member at 
(It's unlikely they'll vote tonight by the way.)
Show this thread
-
"There are lawsuits that can bog things down if we don't get what we want. There are recalls that can be done." Better Cupertino threatens Sandhill and the city councilmembers.
Show this thread
"You're really in a bind now, because of SB 35." We need to elect the right people, to change the laws, so we don't have to be here anymore. YIMBY supported these fine folks: https://www.modernluxury.com/san-francisco/story/the-housing-caucus …
-
-
"The more office you put [in order to pay for all the community benefits] the worse it gets." Former city council member says that he would lose some of the office, losing some of the community benefits for the city. Thinks that's a reasonable trade-off.
Show this thread -
"It the devil promised you eternity, would you trade your soul? ...I'm selfish. Right now sometimes I wait an hour to dine out at a restaurant with families. And I do not want to wait two hours in the future."
Show this thread -
The last public comment is a back-and-forth with Councilmember Scarf saying that millennials want the same single family homes sprawling suburbs that his generation wanted, and that families don't want condos.pic.twitter.com/TEgU5aSC8c
Show this thread -
-
Reminder: "Better Cupertino" is right about one thing: ELECTIONS MATTER. Vote. Donate. Canvass. Put endorsements in the hands of your friends. Friends don't let friends enable NIMBYism.http://Yimbyaction.org/endorsements
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Who said they’re in a bind?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.