There's a poison pill: if Better Cupertino or anyone else sues, there will be a 50% reduction in community benefits. Makes sense when you look at the cost of delay.pic.twitter.com/UlLhaqCwlD
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Discussion about how people report that they want to leave, but population doesn't go down. That's what happens when you attract people with jobs and amenities and then make them miserable with artificially high housing costs.
"..So many of us moved here for the excellent public schools, and frankly many of us are homeowners..." Councilmember makes (somewhat circuitous) point that astronomical housing costs make it hard for teachers and workers to live in the city, reducing everyone's quality of life.
So many people are here to fight for their piece of the community benefits. But it feeds a nasty cycle that housing is a negative that needs to be "offset." This kind of process is not going to get us the housing we need.
"I hope that we're at the beginning of the end or the end of the beginning..."
- @MattRegan10 of @BayAreaCouncil
Talks about the cost of develoment weighed against the cost of NOT developing, that cost of displacement, the cost of people commuting in from Manteca.
City Councilmember who isn't proposing upzoning Cupertino for housing asks folks to comment on jobs/housing balance of the project. Seems not to recognize his direct oversight of the current disaster is maybe a factor...
"We're pretty balanced now." Cupertino has an average home value of more than $2.2 Million.pic.twitter.com/EDYcfDucel
"Market conditions changed, permitting took too long, or municipalities moved the goalposts and now they don't pencil. So many of those projects will remain in the 'pipeline' and never get built." This is how housing dies.
Cupertino is ahead of the pack when it comes to making their housing goal RHNA numbers. But also everyone sucks. Every snowflake in the avalanche points at the snowflake behind them and says, "Well, they're worse than me!"
Guy talks about how Better Cupertino has been fighting to try to bring back the shopping mall. He is hilarious. "Just Google dead mall."
Guy brings up his poll about what current residents want. "Where are the poll results?" "They're dynamic and ever-changing." Methinks this poll is less than scientific...pic.twitter.com/gmBqetyDIK
Woman is upset that "nonresidents" came to meetings. One might even call them "outside agitators."
"As you consider the community benefits package, consider our affordable housing crisis." Woman points out that they maybe could get 30% BMR units if they cut some of the other community benefits. This might not be the best way to dole out public benefits...pic.twitter.com/BVgMZYZMHk
Public comment has entirely been comment and then a bunch if questions. There is no way they're getting through public comment before 11pm.
"You can't have all your housing be 50% Affordable, unless they're all SB35 projects..."pic.twitter.com/kfZT2JW6NQ
"They're all too dense." Man who started his testimony by saying "we all know there's a housing crisis and we should all do our part," ends by calling for heights to come down for a "human scale" project.
"I have two children, UC graduates, great jobs, and they're struggling to find housing too. ...so, we're gonna have to go vertical at some point."
"I need a shopping mall! We don't have a Sears! We don't have a Penny's! ...I would like to have them back. I would like to have a shopping mall destination in my neighborhood. ...I have to drive great distances to have stores that have products."pic.twitter.com/uCLpvj8wqH
"Retail is not dead. Retail is killed by corporates in other states. Let's bring retail back!"pic.twitter.com/dxln4PNLde
"Please do not ignore the traffic impact." Woman advocates for a "less dense" project with more housing and less office. Sounds almost good, but what she's actually asking for is to "go back to the drawing board" so that nothing happens for the foreseeable future.
Woman has lots of complaints about the EIR. If you actually care about the environment, please join YIMBY Action and help us fight for genuine environmental policies that get more people out of their cars.http://Yimbyaction.org/join
Woman is concerned that more students would be bad for the school district, more residents would be bad for traffic, and also there were two robberies at the mall before. "For safety, for school district, for traffic, I must oppose this."
"Housing problem is not created by Cupertino. My grown children are not going to be able to afford a home here. But that is no reason to destroy a community."pic.twitter.com/JG4Jl8Ukk4
We need "sensible growth." Strangely, we've never seen these folks pushing a pro-housing midrise housing plan...
Supporter: "I'm sorry, it's been a long day. ..I've got a 20 year old autistic daughter, and one day she would like to have her own place...As everyone has said it is extremely hard for young people to get by here in this area. ...she's going to need support from us nearby."pic.twitter.com/qqJGfV2Mc4
With the average home value over $2.2 million, "who can afford it? Only the fortunate few." Cupertino Chamber of Commerce here in support.
They're taking a 5 min break now at 11pm. This is totally sane. Nothing cray happening here at all y'all!pic.twitter.com/jNjOB7IVAs
"Um, can I get Google chrome on here?" Young person procedes to argue that any develoment will negatively effect Cupertino in a fashion that makes us question if this is a spoof.
Reason number one: schools are negatively affected by having more students.pic.twitter.com/Ci79bX7iNV
Reason number two: "The idea of Cupertino is that is would have a very well educated population." Very opposed to letting the poors in.pic.twitter.com/Bz559mWTp0
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.