Opens profile photo
Follow
Yonah Freemark
@yfreemark
Cities + Transport + Housing + Politics / / Le progrès ne vaut que s'il est partagé par tous / yonahfreemark.com / thetransportpolitic.com
DCurban.org/author/yonah-f…Joined June 2009

Yonah Freemark’s Tweets

Another slam dunk for Democrats should they choose to take it...put that thing up for a vote immediately and let Republicans sink it!
Quote Tweet
Susan Collins tells @JNicholsonInDC that same-sex marriage bill may be doomed now bc of what Dems did on the inflation reduction bill huffpost.com/entry/collins-
Show this thread
18
235
1,177
Show this thread
This is on the mark. But states and localities continue to have ability/flexibility to get land use patterns that allow short trips to daily destinations, safe bike & ped infrastructure + more reliable transit out of the $1.2 T BIL funding, and much of this bill's transport $.
Quote Tweet
The transportation sector is the largest single contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in the US epa.gov/ghgemissions/s While the Manchin-Schumer reconciliation agreement will encourage declines in transport emissions, it falls far short of being transformative on this front.
Show this thread
1
14
55
👇 always on point. While there’s some good on transpo in there, it perpetuates a car-driven society. Esp in this moment of high gas prices, we need more investment in accessible PUBLIC transport.
Quote Tweet
The transportation sector is the largest single contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in the US epa.gov/ghgemissions/s While the Manchin-Schumer reconciliation agreement will encourage declines in transport emissions, it falls far short of being transformative on this front.
Show this thread
2
13

Topics to follow

Sign up to get Tweets about the Topics you follow in your Home timeline.

Carousel

Federal action is necessary but insufficient to mitigate the extreme heat and rainfall threatening New York: must still quickly implement the NYC Streets Plan and #25x25 must finally #FixTheSubway and invest in our future with #6MinuteService
Quote Tweet
It's going to be up to state & local governments to transform the auto dependence of their communities. Washington won't be the leader. This bill may nevertheless be the best compromise environmentalists are going to get in the US this year or any year in the coming decade.
Show this thread
2
6
if offshore wind leasing is going to be tied to o&g leasing, Big Greens should think about what it would take to lease and set aside tracts. under GOMESA, with 2021 lease sale rates, that's almost $900 million to the Land and Water Conservation fund.
2
13
37
I also am concerned—given overwhelmingly positive reaction among many Senators & environmentalists—that bill reflects a myopia with regard to the transport sector. We *must* think of green transport beyond just electric cars. There is so much more. End:
Quote Tweet
It's going to be up to state & local governments to transform the auto dependence of their communities. Washington won't be the leader. This bill may nevertheless be the best compromise environmentalists are going to get in the US this year or any year in the coming decade.
Show this thread
4
21
117
Show this thread
It's nice to see the US taking action on climate change—it is a huge deal to finally have a bill. But, when it comes to transport, this bill is one-dimensional & unlikely to be transformative. It will not do much to contribute to producing vibrant, green cities we need.
1
7
93
Show this thread
Without a mode shift combined with concerted efforts to encourage better land use, we'll continue to see: —Degradation of ecological systems with urban sprawl; —Higher emissions from the building sector; —Higher resource needs from having to move all those cars around
2
18
111
Show this thread
This is very concerning. As I noted last night, one of the primary impacts of this bill is simply reaffirming the automobile dependency of the US, giving people huge incentives to invest in cars—and doing almost nothing for an alternative system.
Quote Tweet
My immediate takeaway: While this bill could contribute a lot to reducing US emissions, it's going to help reinforce nation's automobile dependency. No support for transit, cycling, & just a tiny bit for a walkability program—but huge amounts for tax credits for EV purchasing. twitter.com/igorbobic/stat…
Show this thread
3
22
112
Show this thread
But what the bill would do *nothing* on is: —Encourage mode shift out of cars (it provides $0 for e-bikes & nothing for transit electrification); —Encourage more environmentally sensitive land uses; and —Reduce the resource intensity of the transport sector.
3
21
135
Show this thread
The bill would include major new and point-of-sale tax credits for new & used electric cars. That's essential for helping the US catch up on vehicle electrification, where it has fallen far behind. twitter.com/johnvoelcker/s urban.org/urban-wire/car
Image
Quote Tweet
Whoa! The proposed Senate deal w/Manchin, *IF* it passes, would extend "clean-car" incentives for #EV purchase. (THREAD) - AND, it would convert them to a point-of-sale rebate. Hurray, hurray, hurray - Also adds a $4,000 credit f/used clean cars. (1 of 3)
Show this thread
4
1
38
Show this thread
My immediate takeaway: While this bill could contribute a lot to reducing US emissions, it's going to help reinforce nation's automobile dependency. No support for transit, cycling, & just a tiny bit for a walkability program—but huge amounts for tax credits for EV purchasing.
Quote Tweet
Text for the Inflation Reduction Act is out democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/
31
196
854
Show this thread
No federal e-bike rebate in the new Congressional package. So you can get $7500 for buying an electric SUV, but 0 for buying an e-bike/e-cargo bike that pollutes a fraction as much (and poses virtually no risk of killing someone in a crash). I do not understand the logic here.
Quote Tweet
Inflation Reduction Act first read thru: No, ebike credit not included. Yes, huge disappointment. But looks like Neighborhood Access and Equity Grant Program has $3b for transportation infrastructure. Good.
Show this thread
67
498
2,431
Show this thread
for those asking why we spend so much time harping on /'s terrible proposals: the feds ain't gonna help us. it's up to us, state by state, city by city, to demand our leaders invest in greener, cleaner, safer transportation investments.
Quote Tweet
It's going to be up to state & local governments to transform the auto dependence of their communities. Washington won't be the leader. This bill may nevertheless be the best compromise environmentalists are going to get in the US this year or any year in the coming decade.
Show this thread
8
28
The compromise bill gives you a tax credit if you buy a pricey truck or SUV… but not if you buy a pricey regular car.
Quote Tweet
The EV tax credit is limited to trucks, vans and SUVs with an MSRP of no more than $80,000, while cars could have an MSRP or no more than $55,000 democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/
4
13
37
See this thread for more details on the transportation elements of the proposal:
Quote Tweet
There's a lot of transportation-related stuff in here beyond the electric vehicle tax credits democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/
Show this thread
1
8
53
Show this thread
It's going to be up to state & local governments to transform the auto dependence of their communities. Washington won't be the leader. This bill may nevertheless be the best compromise environmentalists are going to get in the US this year or any year in the coming decade.
7
60
265
Show this thread
It would provide no funding for affordable housing, no support for better land uses. In other words, when it comes to a more environmentally friendly urban system, it's all about electrifying the car-based lifestyle, and little else.
2
36
215
Show this thread
My immediate takeaway: While this bill could contribute a lot to reducing US emissions, it's going to help reinforce nation's automobile dependency. No support for transit, cycling, & just a tiny bit for a walkability program—but huge amounts for tax credits for EV purchasing.
Quote Tweet
Text for the Inflation Reduction Act is out democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/
31
196
854
Show this thread
Appears to give clean vehicle credits of up to $7,500 for people purchasing zero-emissions cars; $7,500 for clean commercial vehicles. Puts limit on income & price of vehicle
4
5
28
Show this thread
I see no mention of rail or public transportation. The bill would provide $1.9 billion to Neighborhood access and equity grant program; $1.1 b for transport investments in low-income neighborhoods
3
23
205
Show this thread
A potentially huge incentive for electrification of the automotive fleet—which raises the question: will the transportation sector outside of the car market see any benefit?
Quote Tweet
The electric vehicle tax credit is in, per sources. Americans would get up to $4,000 for buying a used EV and $7,500 for a new EV, although there would be income thresholds limiting who can access the credit.
Show this thread
4
11
65
The compromise
Quote Tweet
The "Inflation Reduction Act of 2022" would mandate offshore lease sales in the Gulf and off the coast of Alaska, per two sources familiar. Still, it would be the biggest #climate bill in U.S. history.
Show this thread
1
1
17
Really strong statement in favor of the Manchin-Schumer deal from one of the top environmentalists in the Senate
Quote Tweet
We’ve fought long and hard for climate action and I believe we have agreement on a package that passes the climate test. A historic down payment on emissions reductions, jobs, and justice. I will do everything in my power to get these important priorities across the finish line.
2
16
Update on Inflation Reduction Act: This will be the biggest climate action in human history. $370B for investments in clean energy, clean transportation, energy storage, farming, home electrification, and clean tech. The planet is on fire. Let’s get it done.
1,154
5,830
29.6K
A reminder that when we decry the lack of adequate housing construction over the past few decades in wealthy countries, in many cases we’re reporting on the elimination of support for public housing construction.
Quote Tweet
I want to build housing too, only I want it to look closer to - and better than - what that thick red band in the second chart through the mid-1970s looked like.
Show this thread
Image
Image
1
7
26
The White House’s original Build Back Better proposal included $318 billion for affordable housing. Despite the essential need for investment in housing, that’s been whittled down to $0, first cut from the infrastructure law and nonexistent in the Manchin-Schumer deal.
Quote Tweet
Spoiler: it’s HOUSING COSTS. An “Inflation Reduction Act” that doesn’t address skyrocketing rents and needed housing supply is missing the point. politico.com/news/2022/03/1 cc @Sen_JoeManchin @SenSchumer @BrianDeeseNEC
3
18
67