while some may be aware of this, many are not. It wasnt mentioned by 1 candidate/speaker on Saturday. Hence: misinformation/politics
To be clear: a NO vote on Sherman-Bway opens way for market-rate building, 200 units, 0 affordability @ any income lvl. Not mentioned on Sat
-
-
-
I appreciate the voices of those who have done research on this project & have a thought out position. I do not for those using fear
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Beacuse they can just build as-of-right?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wouldn't a vote NO also set precedent to other developers? The owners have owned
#ShermanPlaza for a decade and not done anything.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It seems to me that if they wanted to build that high-rise, they could have over the last decade. It does not seem profitable as is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
When the developer sells, no units have to be "affordable". There's a GIANT loophole that I haven't seen you address.
#SaveInwoodThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Some rally organizers admit they should have limited politicians speaking. All of us are amateurs at this. Don't blame everyone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does it matter what was mentioned at any one meeting or rally? No one favors it. Isn't it clear? You think you know better than us?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.