2. I could give two shits about this guy, but news orgs have to decide, if the person's conduct isn't against the law, does the story benefit by naming them? Story is newsworthy, discovering who made the video important, naming them isn't..doesn't add anything. Sets bad precedent
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Transparency.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I only partially agree. This guy made false news that MAGA ate up. I have no sympathy for him.
-
He made a video. "Journalists" made it news.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
agree.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Isn’t the individual who created it THE story? It sure isn’t Pelosi.
-
Yeah, just some schmo making a video....let's out him!!!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
By that logic, an average citizen who commits a crime like murder or even something more mundane like drunk driving and causing an accident shouldn't have his name reported, then.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.