The reviews now are more intense and demand more and more data and figures. Whether this improves quality is debatable
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Well, now we need to look at more confounding variables, multiple evidence from different datasets, etc. Previous studies were not examining all possibilities, usually they published separate studies per each new validation/dataset.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Although, in terms of data, I believe that the format paper+supplementary is not the best way to communicate findings nowadays, but I don't know what alternative to use. (A wiki-style?)
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Older papers were more superficial. "Less is more" is a fallacy in this context.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
excellent question. People also used to get PI positions with one or two papers in JEM 30 years ago I heard. I think before all suppl materials were listed as "personal observation" or "data not shown" but now they can upload all those online, no limit on paper.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Interesting observation ! I think now research, at least on my field, is becoming more multimodal and generates more data, which not necessarily answer a question.however, I do believe that "old" papers were more methodologically detailed than nowadays helping reproduces ability
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.