https://extranewsfeed.com/tolerance-is-not-a-moral-precept-1af7007d6376 …
This was a good read today, and one I needed; thanks to @mithriltabby for the link.
My point is that in any kind of functional state you should not take on the use of force against people you don't like outside of the consequence of strictly reactive self defense, and I think this article is advocating something else.
-
-
Or I guess actually that my point is "having an opinion that the social peace is bullshit is not the same as actually violating the social peace, and people with those opinions should still be protected."
-
I can sign on to this, with the codicil "... from preemptive violence, until and unless they break that peace with actual non-opinion non-speech violence."
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think that's a defensible argument and reasonable position to take.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.