https://extranewsfeed.com/tolerance-is-not-a-moral-precept-1af7007d6376 …
This was a good read today, and one I needed; thanks to @mithriltabby for the link.
But I would still consider that within the ambit of toleration.
-
-
But when you say the "peace treaty" does not apply - that sounds like war footing. It sounds like someone to whom ordinary, fundamental moral considerations do not apply. So I am suspicious that it is you who are motte and bailying between "violently suppress" and "shun"
-
A reasonable suspicion induced by the choice of terminology in the article, and one of its weaknesses. No, I do not support preemptive uses of force. And I don't equate speech with a use of force, as I've seen others do.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ah. Then it's a disagreement on terminology, then. That's roughly my own position, but I'd consider it not toleration. Just today I saw some chiding happen over what I'd consider fairly minor 'btw, this person is _pretty fash-adjacent_ in case you didn't know' stuff.
-
Some folks have overgenerous interpretations of tolerance/geek social fallacy'd themselves into knots such that 'don't really amplify/hang out with subjugation enthusiasts' is, to them, a breach of ethical obligations to tolerance.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.