You ever worry that you've gone so far into your own conceptual meaning map on some topics that no one knows what the hell you're going on about? My heart goes out to PhD academics, I see you
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @liminal_warmth1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
-
-
Replying to @liminal_warmth
Then ponder the challenges inside your *own* brain. http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/SocietyOfMind …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @BillSeitz
Have you written any books? I’d kind of like to sample a set of your most important ideas and concepts without tunneling through a wiki If you haven’t maybe think about it
5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @liminal_warmth @BillSeitz
This is my #1 gripe about
@Meaningness too2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
W meaningness (the blogspace) I could recognize that something important was being articulated, but it took other writers to make me really grok it.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @xstntlprvrt69 @liminal_warmth and
I lurked LW and respected their a) commitment to falsification and b) their willingness to bite bullets, but never really got into the rigorously quantification thing. Seemed somehow deficient to me. It was James Scott and NNT who really articulated *why* for me.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
LW never really resonated for me I like to sample their ideas sometimes but found most of the framework dissatisfying for various reasons
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Also not convinced everything labelled a "cognitive bias" or "fallacy" is actually always useless/harmful/wrong, and left with the burning question of how and why they would evolve if they were.
-
-
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
