Yes. Except how far did the misinformation spread before that happened? How many still believe it is true?
-
-
-
I agree, that is unfortunate. As I've written before, though (https://freethoughtblogs.com/fierceroller/?p=4705 …), I don't think the problem is that preprint servers give scientists a place to post non peer-reviewed research. Anybody with a domain could do that without
@biorxivpreprint. - Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I am much more careful with submitted drafts now they go on a Preprint server first.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I’m confused where is the step where someone made a few million dollars in that process? There MUST be something wrong...


Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Wonder why arxiv doesn't provide the same discussion functionality for each paper
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Preprint servers are double-edged swords, almost everything is. But journalists should really do their job responsibly and go after quality information, not clicks.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.