Tweetovi
- Tweetovi, trenutna stranica.
- Tweetovi i odgovori
- Medijski sadržaj
Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @xphilosopher
Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @xphilosopher
-
Exciting new paper in experimental philosophy of causation. If C causes E, must it be that C either directly causes E or causes an intermediary that in turn causes E? The surprise answer is: nohttps://twitter.com/ax_phi/status/1224887813541285889 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Experimental Philos proslijedio/la je Tweet
New paper on "Actual Causation and Compositionality" out now in Philosophy of Science: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/706085 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
New paper from philosopher Hanna Pickard argues that experimental philosophy research on causation and counterfactuals can help us understand what goes so wrong in people's ordinary judgments about rape https://www.hannapickard.com/uploads/3/1/5/5/31550141/pickard_-_responsibility_and_explanations_of_rape_prepub.pdf …pic.twitter.com/Z5IVbwDzVE
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Experimental Philos proslijedio/la je Tweet
Is there any decent advice out there for ECRs and PhDs who want to do x-phi but who find that their institution does not have any relevant researchers/research groups that can support/facilitate their experimental designs and data collection?
@bioxphi@xphilosopher@ax_phiHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Maybe they think the essence of the sapling lies in its telos – the thing it is ultimately supposed to become On this view, the folk conception is a lot less like contemporary science and a lot more like Aristotle
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Take a sapling that will one day grow into an oak tree. It looks very different from a full-grown oak tree, but people still think it is an oak. Why? Traditional explanation: Hidden biological properties (e.g., oak DNA) But maybe that's not right...
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Fascinating new experimental philosophy paper from Rose and Nichols argues that ordinary folk show a form "teleological essentialism."https://xphiblog.com/teleological-essentialism-generalized/ …
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Experimental Philos proslijedio/la je Tweet
Is the true self truly moral? Identity intuitions across domains of sociomoral reasoning and age https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022096519302887 … "Moral norms are more central to identity than purely social-conventional norms and become relatively more central to identity in adulthood."pic.twitter.com/ClhSGrljDL
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
There has already been lots of research on ordinary intuitions about justice, but this paper takes a new approach. It looks not just at what people think is the best answer but what people think is the best *method*. Do people endorse the veil of ignorance?https://twitter.com/mattlindauer/status/1215285132661227520 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Experimental Philos proslijedio/la je Tweet
This is a cool result, and it fits a growing body of evidence that, by default, people consider possibilities that are both high in probability and high in value.https://twitter.com/H_Sjastad/status/1214189736652419074 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
New study uses IAT to explore people's implicit understanding of free will. Regardless of what people say at an explicit, theoretical level, do they have an implicit commitment to the Strawsonian view? https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12152-019-09426-3 …pic.twitter.com/wTYcKMXaFo
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Experimental Philos proslijedio/la je Tweet
SEP: Moral Psychology: Empirical Approaches https://ift.tt/2sDJeJC
#philosophyHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Experimental Philos proslijedio/la je Tweet
New paper on causal attributions. Shows that a surprising pattern of effects previously found for causal attributions is also found for responsibility attributions. And argues that this close correspondence calls out for explanation.https://twitter.com/PhilSciArchive/status/1214138170117246976 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Experimental Philos proslijedio/la je Tweet
We tend to see norm-violating rather than norm-conforming factors as the cause of an outcome. Cool experiment by
@paul-henna et al shows this is not related to social or moral cognition, and also applies to prospective outcomes: https://buff.ly/2ZOVQj9 HT@andyvonaschpic.twitter.com/PoGp006WNp
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Experimental Philos proslijedio/la je Tweet
Why is it okay to say: “cars are for driving” but not “cars are for parking”? You generally park cars just as often as you drive them. Joanna Korman and I studied these sentences — called teleological generics — in a paper now in press at Cogniton.https://osf.io/92qp3/
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
New paper on norms and causal judgmentshttps://twitter.com/paul_henne/status/1211810105970364417 …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Experimental Philos proslijedio/la je Tweet
You know what happens when the world thinks you're dead? 6 Underground. Only on Netflix.pic.twitter.com/RQEQwkBRDo
-
Experimental Philos proslijedio/la je Tweet
Is there a good recent survey (last year or two) of competing explanations of the side effect effect?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
The difference between fields is striking: no one would think you could be a specialist in philosophy of physics without knowing what a second derivative is, but traditionally, people did think you could be a specialist in philosophy of psychology without knowing what a t-test is
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi -
Philosopher Mark Kalderon voicing an opinion I don't think I've heard before: That it doesn't make sense to specialize in philosophy of psychology while having almost no concrete understanding of stats. I'm curious what people think about this https://316am.site123.me/articles/tactile?c=end-times-series …pic.twitter.com/EhF65f3QvP
Prikaži ovu nitHvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.