I honestly feel 90% of the systemd hate is cargo cult we've been doing it this way for however many decades and we can't do something new now.
-
-
-
Alternatively, one vendor is steadily replacing open standards and conventions with effectively proprietary ones that they impose on an entire industry and control the documentation for. The license is Free, but GNU/Linux is becoming IBM/Red Hat/Linux. Good luck with that.
- Još 5 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Honestly, it's really not that unpopular of an opinion. I mean, it won the "init wars" for a reason. But systemd hate has long stopped being about any technical factors, and through a perfect storm of coincidence become a core part of an us vs them ingroup mythology.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I can agree with that. I don‘t agree with systemd-timesyncd and systemd-resolved. Both are badly written pieces of buggy software that cause lots of trouble. (and don‘t get me started on systemd-networkd) The init daemon itself is useful.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Are there even any employable systemd haters left at this point?
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
it's a hammer. There are lots of nails, so it is good that a hammer exists, and it's the best tool for the job. People have started hammering in screws to prove that it's the only tool we will ever need.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.