Quote this tweet with an opinion about programming that will get you unjustly dunked on.
(I'm going first)
-
-
Or its part of the success :) Lossy training and stochastic algorithms due to bugs
-
Gradient descent, uh, finds a way.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
"We want to build safe AI, we are working on ethics, explainability, de-biasing, trust,…" Narrator voice: "But they used Python"
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
<mode type=“pedant”>Python is strongly, dynamically typed. A string is not suddenly going to behave like an integer, like in JavaScript (try adding "4" + 2). You are hankering for static typing, instead. https://stackoverflow.com/q/11328920/100297 …</mode>
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I thought ML routines were typically implemented in C, but callable from Python?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Perhaps you mean dynamic typing. Python is strongly typed. if you do 'x' + 3 you will get an error, hence it is strongly typed. JS you will get 'x3' There is no research saying that programs using dynamically type languages has more bugs than statically type languages. it's myth
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.