Unique concept. The league is trying to find a way to give both teams a shot to win a game in overtime. They are also trying to do it quickly. It’s basically an evolved version of college overtime.
Our trip to Austin provided the perfect opportunity to test out exciting new potential rule changes.
SVP of Football Ops Doug Whaley breaks down our vision for a more innovative overtime. #XFL2020pic.twitter.com/xVRdZqlNza
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Luv it! Less wasted time and more Mano-a-Mano action to secure the victory.
#XFLInnovationBedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
I don’t love it. But I’m willing to see it in action before I say it’s a bad idea. And also, bring a team to San Antonio... like right now!pic.twitter.com/g7Uz0caJ7S
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Come to San Antonio
-
I have a good feeling they might expand as well. San Antonio had a huge AAF following.
- Nog 2 antwoorden
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
I like the concept. It’s very fair. Both teams get a chance to win. You don’t risk the safety of the players by playing 5 or 6 quarters. No coin toss or kicker deciding a winner. Quick resolution to a tie.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
- Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
It's just like soccer's penalty kicks format. OT is five innings. The team that has the most end zone scores out of five is the winner. I like the AAF's OT format the best.
-
The difference is. Both teams get a fair shot to win. No coin toss or kicker determining the game. Plus unlike soccer. It still stays as an offense vs defense 11 on 11 game. No a scorer vs goalie situation
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.