On review, the information is consistent with PC members inappropriately sharing conference data, rather than a hack.https://twitter.com/xexd/status/1222292513903349760 …
-
-
It is possible that a hack of some kind was used to exfiltrate this data, but seems unlikely. It is possible also that PC member credentials were used without their knowledge. HotCRP now tracks more information about paper and review downloads.
Prikaži ovu nit -
The SIGARCH & TCCA chairs have stated that there was “no evidence of misconduct as part of the paper review process” at ISCA '19. This evidence shows misconduct at ISCA '19. So far that misconduct appears to have occurred after acceptance decisions were made.
Prikaži ovu nit -
I encourage anyone with evidence of misconduct involving http://HotCRP.com sites to reach out to me with their concerns and evidence.
@VHuixiang After evidence is shared, I also encourage the deletion of inappropriately obtained data.Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I got the impression that the authors had access to reviews and the reviewer identities during the rebuttal phase while preparing their response, which happened before the PC meeting and after the review process started. It might be more than simply downloading all the papers.
-
There is no evidence so far that the authors had access to reviewer identities while preparing their response. I am not confirming or denying any reviewer identities, but many people are misreading the first set of images.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Thank you for your ongoing service to the community.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.