I just think treating a company with $500MM of revenue that mostly makes a web browser as a scrappy upstart is pretty misleading, both internally and externally. It's not like you can't be proud of working at a huge company, but the dissonance makes pride harder.
-
-
Though I think it's not just the cost of building an implementation of the Web, but also the cost of building products that make that implementation relevant. An implementation of the Web can't help users without widely used products built with a similar set of values.
-
I of course agree. And it seems impossible to litigate a budget of this size over Twitter so I'll stop trying
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.